| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| postuloca:comparison [2013-07-16 15:42] – [IPIN 2013 SIMULATIONS] pietro | postuloca:comparison [2014-11-17 15:50] (current) – [New Scenario] pietro |
|---|
| |
| The tomographic approach suffers the parameters calibration of the weights of the regularization matrix, as show the values in the TAB.1 with label no noise. | The tomographic approach suffers the parameters calibration of the weights of the regularization matrix, as show the values in the TAB.1 with label no noise. |
| | |
| | ===== New Scenario ===== |
| | |
| | This video shows the PATH1 followed by the target, for a scenario with 24 anchors and the VRTI algorithm{{:postuloca:misure_path1_s24_multi_qtv.avi|}}\\ |
| | This video shows the PATH2 followed by the target, for a scenario with 24 anchors and the VRTI algorithm{{:postuloca:misure_path1_s24_multi_qtv.avi|}}\\ |
| | This video shows the PATH3 followed by the target, for a scenario with 24 anchors and the VRTI algorithm{{:postuloca:misure_path1_s24_multi_qtv.avi|}} |
| |
| ===== Tomographic approach ===== | ===== Tomographic approach ===== |
| ^ comparison_m12-16-20-24_mu2mo|{{:postuloca:comparison_m12-16-20-24_mu2mo.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 4 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| | ^ comparison_m12-16-20-24_mu2mo|{{:postuloca:comparison_m12-16-20-24_mu2mo.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 4 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| |
| ^ comparison_m17-25_mu2mo |{{:postuloca:comparison_m17-25_mu2mo.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 2 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| | ^ comparison_m17-25_mu2mo |{{:postuloca:comparison_m17-25_mu2mo.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 2 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| |
| ^ comparison_mono_multi |{{:postuloca:comparison_mono_multi.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 1,2 and 4 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1, 2 and 4 Radio Channel, respectively, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| | ^ comparison_mono_multi |{{:postuloca:comparison_mono_multi.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 1,2 and 4 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1, 2 and 4 Radio Channel, respectively, variance sampling window 3, 5 and 10 seconds| |
| ^ :::||:::| | ^ comparison mono-channel to multi-channel, with mono-channel filtered out from multi-channel|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch12_filtered.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 4 Radio Channel (12,16,20,24) \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel filtered out from multi-channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| |
| ^ comparison mono filtered from multi||Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 4 Radio Channel \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| | ^ :::|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch16_filtered.png?200|}}|:::| |
| ^ :::||:::| | ^ :::|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch20_filtered.png?200|}}|:::| |
| ^ :::||:::| | ^ :::|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch24_filtered.png?200|}}|:::| |
| | ^ comparison mono-channel to multi-channel, with mono-channel filtered out from multi-channel|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch17_filtered.png?200|}}|Area 3.6 m X 4.8 m, 20 sensors, Data Collection on 2 Radio Channel (17,25) \\ Data elaboration on 1 Radio Channel filtered out from multi-channel, variance sampling window 3 and 5 seconds| |
| | ^ :::|{{:postuloca:comparison_ch25_filtered.png?200|}}|:::| |
| | |
